The nucleus is surrounded by a cloud of fast moving, negatively charged, electrons that are bound to it by electric forces. The change from Bohr's model is how electrons occupy space.
Scientists now believe that electrons move in regions rather than in orbits and use mathematics and quantum numbers to describe this.
Bohr's model is quite adequate for describing the chemical properties of an atom. Atomic theory - modern models Rutherford atomic Model The Bohr atomic model The modern quantum atomic theory.
Rutherford's atom. Rutherford's model demise. Bohr's Atom. Quantum atom. Used with Permission. Rutherford found that a small percentage of alpha particles were deflected at large angles, which could be explained by an atom with a very small, dense, positively-charged nucleus at its center bottom. Surprisingly, while most of the alpha particles were indeed undeflected, a very small percentage about 1 in particles bounced off the gold foil at very large angles.
Some were even redirected back toward the source. No prior knowledge had prepared them for this discovery. Rutherford needed to come up with an entirely new model of the atom in order to explain his results. Because the vast majority of the alpha particles had passed through the gold, he reasoned that most of the atom was empty space.
In contrast, the particles that were highly deflected must have experienced a tremendously powerful force within the atom. The nucleus is the tiny, dense, central core of the atom and is composed of protons and neutrons. In the nuclear atom, the protons and neutrons, which comprise nearly all of the mass of the atom, are located in the nucleus at the center of the atom.
The electrons are distributed around the nucleus and occupy most of the volume of the atom. It is worth emphasizing just how small the nucleus is compared to the rest of the atom.
If we could blow up an atom to be the size of a large professional football stadium, the nucleus would be about the size of a marble. However, it did not completely address the nature of the electrons and the way in which they occupied the vast space around the nucleus. It was not until some years later that a full understanding of the electron was achieved. Within a few months, Rutherford was awarded the Nobel Prize for Chemistry, "for his investigations into the disintegration of the elements, and the chemistry of radioactive substances.
Rutherford next turned his attention to using them to probe the atom. The autumn of began an important series of researches. Geiger thought Ernest Marsden — , a year-old student in Honours Physics, was ready to help on these experiments and suggested it to Rutherford. Since Rutherford often pushed third-year students into research, saying this was the best way to learn about physics, he readily agreed. Geiger and Marsden began with small-angle dispersion and tried various thicknesses of foils, seeking mathematical relationships between dispersion and thickness of foil or number of atoms traversed.
Marsden later recalled that Rutherford said to him amidst these experiments: "See if you can get some effect of alpha-particles directly reflected from a metal surface. Rutherford was ever ready to meet the unexpected and exploit it, where favourable, but he also knew when to stop on such excursions. Birks, , p. This was Rutherford's playful approach in action. His students and others tried out his ideas, many of which were dead-ends. Rutherford wrote:. Experiment, directed by the disciplined imagination either of an individual or, still better, of a group of individuals of varied mental outlook, is able to achieve results which far transcend the imagination alone of the greatest philosopher.
Quoted in Eve, , Frontmatter. Sometime later in or , Marsden said, he reported his results to Rutherford. Rutherford recalled this a little differently:. I remember It was almost incredible as if you fired a inch shell at a piece of tissue paper and it came back and hit you. Rutherford , , p. Human memory is fallible. Whether Marsden or Geiger told Rutherford, the effect was the same.
Rutherford said they should prepare a publication from this research, which they submitted in May Moreover, this started Rutherford thinking toward what ultimately, almost two years later, he published as a theory of the atom.
What was Rutherford doing for the rest of and all of ? For one thing, his close friend Boltwood was in Manchester for the academic year working with Rutherford on radioactive decay products of radium.
He was also reviewing and speaking on earlier ideas about atomic structure. Rutherford did not have his bold idea — the nuclear atom — instantly, but he came to it gradually by considering the problem from many sides. In the autumn of he brought Marsden back to Manchester to complete rigorous experimental testing of his ideas with Geiger. Rutherford tried to reconcile scattering results with different atomic models, especially that of J.
Thomson, in which the positive electricity was considered as dispersed evenly throughout the whole sphere of the atom. At some point in the winter of —, Rutherford worked out the basic idea of an atom with a "charged center. To produce a similar effect by a magnetic field, the enormous field of absolute units would be required.
Birks, p. Rutherford concluded in his May paper that such a remarkable deviation in the path of a massive charged particle could only be achieved if most of the mass of, say, an atom of gold and most of its charge were concentrated in a very small central body. Note: at this point in , Rutherford did not call this a "nucleus. The first public announcement of the nuclear theory by Rutherford was made at a meeting of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society, and he invited us young boys to go to the meeting.
The older people in the laboratory did, of course Geiger and Marsden knew because they were already doing the experiments. In fact, unless they had done some which were sufficient to be decisive, Rutherford never mentioned it publicly. And, of course, Darwin knew about it much earlier. But that must have been early in , and we went to the meeting and he told us. And he mentioned then that there was some experimental evidence which had been obtained by Geiger and Marsden.
He did not, as far as I remember, say more about the results than that they were quite decisive. If you look at some of his papers in the early days — I call McGill the early days — he was quite convinced that the alpha particles were atoms of helium, but he never said that in those words. He always said they were either atoms of helium or molecules of hydrogen or perhaps he may have said something else of that weight.
It was quite characteristic of him that he would never say a thing was so unless he had experimental evidence for it that really satisfied him. He worked out quickly and roughly that several quantitative relationships should be true if this basic theory were correct. Second, that number should be proportional to the square of the nuclear charge.
These three ideas laid out the experimental program of Geiger and Marsden for the next year. He had done very little teaching in McGill. He was research professor. I suppose he gave some lectures but it would have been very few.
And his interest was quite naturally on the research side. He did give some lectures, but elementary lectures, the kind of thing you would expect a man to know before he came to the University. They were the lectures to the engineers.
They were a rowdy lot and Rutherford could keep them under control. There was perhaps only one other man in the department who could have done it, and he Rutherford? It's often been said to me that Rutherford was a bad lecturer.
0コメント